People v. Schloss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Schloss

22 A.D.2d 709, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2922

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 709 (People v. Schloss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Schloss, 22 A.D.2d 709, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Oral application by defendant to the Honorable Samuel Rabin, Associate Justice of the Appellate Dixdsion of the Supreme Court, Second Judicial Department, for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals from an order of the Appellate Term in said department, affirming a judgment of conviction rendered by the Criminal Court of the City of New York. After hearing the defendant and the District Attorney of Queens County, the application is granted by Mr. Justice Rabin. A certificate will be issued by him, pursuant to statute (Code Crim. Pro., § 520, subd. 1), granting defendant permission to appeal and certifying that a question of law is involved which ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oral application by defendant to the Honorable Samuel Rabin, Associate Justice of the Appellate Dixdsion of the Supreme Court, Second Judicial Department, for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals from an order of the Appellate Term in said department, affirming a judgment of conviction rendered by the Criminal Court of the City of New York. After hearing the defendant and the District Attorney of Queens County, the application is granted by Mr. Justice Rabin. A certificate will be issued by him, pursuant to statute (Code Crim. Pro., § 520, subd. 1), granting defendant permission to appeal and certifying that a question of law is involved which ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 709, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-schloss-nyappdiv-1964.