People v. Schiavone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Schiavone

42 A.D.2d 738, 345 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3849

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 9, 1973

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 42 A.D.2d 738 (People v. Schiavone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Schiavone, 42 A.D.2d 738, 345 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered June 9, 1972, (1) revoking probation theretofore granted to him on March 20, 1970 upon a conviction of attempted grand larceny in the third degree and (2) resentencing him to a one-year term in the New York City Department of Correction, to run consecutively with a sentence he was then serving. Amended judgment reversed as to the resentence, on the law, and case remanded to the Criminal Term for resentence. After revoking the original sentence of probation, the trial court imposed a new sentence, for violation of probation, under CPL 410.70, but failed to ask defendant as required by CPL 380.50, whether he wished to make a statement in his own behalf. This constituted error, requiring that defendant be remanded for resentence upon his guilty plea to violation of probation. Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered June 9, 1972, (1) revoking probation theretofore granted to him on March 20, 1970 upon a conviction of attempted grand larceny in the third degree and (2) resentencing him to a one-year term in the New York City Department of Correction, to run consecutively with a sentence he was then serving. Amended judgment reversed as to the resentence, on the law, and case remanded to the Criminal Term for resentence. After revoking the original sentence of probation, the trial court imposed a new sentence, for violation of probation, under CPL 410.70, but failed to ask defendant as required by CPL 380.50, whether he wished to make a statement in his own behalf. This constituted error, requiring that defendant be remanded for resentence upon his guilty plea to violation of probation. Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 738, 345 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-schiavone-nyappdiv-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack