People v. Schettini

171 A.D.2d 820

This text of 171 A.D.2d 820 (People v. Schettini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Schettini, 171 A.D.2d 820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.), rendered March 15, 1988, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to two consecutive indeterminate terms of 5 to 15 years imprisonment.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision that the terms of imprisonment are to run consecutively, and substituting therefor a provision that the terms of imprisonment shall run concurrently to each other; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

[821]*821Viewing the evidence, in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt (see, Penal Law § 15.05 [3]; People v Green, 56 NY2d 427; People v Licitra, 47 NY2d 554). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

Since the two victims died as a result of the same series of events caused by the defendant, we agree that the sentences imposed should run concurrently to each other and the defendant’s sentence is modified accordingly (see, Penal Law § 70.25 [2]; see also, People v Kirkwood, 165 AD2d 881; People v Coleman, 153 AD2d 756, 757). We do not find, however, that the sentence was otherwise excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Lawrence, J. P., Harwood, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Licitra
393 N.E.2d 456 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Green
437 N.E.2d 1146 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Coleman
153 A.D.2d 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Kirkwood
165 A.D.2d 881 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 A.D.2d 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-schettini-nyappdiv-1991.