People v. Scheck
335 N.E.2d 844, 36 N.Y.2d 918, 373 N.Y.S.2d 535, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2015
Opinion
Memorandum. Although the incident upon which this conviction is based seems bizarre, the matter is now beyond the fact-finding stage and the existence of evidence establishing the elements of the offense compels us to affirm.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Scheck, 335 N.E.2d 844, 36 N.Y.2d 918, 373 N.Y.S.2d 535, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2015 (N.Y. 1975).
335 N.E.2d 844 (People v. Scheck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Santos
341 N.E.2d 554 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)