Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Schafer

People v. Schafer

234 A.D.2d 972, 652 N.Y.S.2d 183, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13719
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D.2d 972 (People v. Schafer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Schafer, 234 A.D.2d 972, 652 N.Y.S.2d 183, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13719 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Because defendant failed to comply with a presentence condition to which he had voluntarily agreed, County Court properly sentenced defendant to an enhanced sentence (see generally, People v Smith, 85 NY2d 919, 920; People v Avery, 85 NY2d 503, 507).. We have examined defendant’s remaining argument, and conclude that it is without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Dwyer, J.—Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Wesley, Doerr and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Smith
650 N.E.2d 409 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Avery
650 N.E.2d 384 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 A.D.2d 972, 652 N.Y.S.2d 183, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-schafer-nyappdiv-1996.