Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Scata, Bolognia, Didonne, Zizzo, Kimmel

People v. Scata, Bolognia, Didonne, Zizzo, Kimmel

5 N.E.2d 352, 272 N.Y. 602, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1093
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 17, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 5 N.E.2d 352 (People v. Scata, Bolognia, Didonne, Zizzo, Kimmel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Scata, Bolognia, Didonne, Zizzo, Kimmel, 5 N.E.2d 352, 272 N.Y. 602, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1093 (N.Y. 1936).

Opinion

As to each defendant, judgment of conviction affirmed. The error in the judge’s charge as to the effect of a promise by the Assistant District Attorney did not in our opinion affect the substantial right of the defendants. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Finch, JJ. Dissenting as to defendants Kimmel, Bruno and Zizzo; Lehman and Loughran, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Zizzo
38 Misc. 2d 428 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
People ex rel. Zizzo v. Fay
16 A.D.2d 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
People v. Kimmel
13 A.D.2d 549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
People v. Zizzo
9 Misc. 2d 484 (New York County Courts, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 N.E.2d 352, 272 N.Y. 602, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-scata-bolognia-didonne-zizzo-kimmel-ny-1936.