People v. Scanlon

143 A.D.3d 746, 38 N.Y.S.3d 437
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 2016·No. 2014-06387·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered July 15, 2013, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

*747 Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 341-342 [2015]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]). The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]).

Rivera, J.R, Chambers, Roman and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Scanlon, 143 A.D.3d 746, 38 N.Y.S.3d 437 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

143 A.D.3d 746 (People v. Scanlon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Smith
2018 NY Slip Op 4358 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)