People v. Scalise

42 N.E.2d 494, 288 N.Y. 220, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1030
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 4, 1942·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There was sufficient proof to justify conviction on the 58th count charging grand larceny by embezzlement. As to the four forgery counts, however, which charge violations of subdivision 1 of the first part of section 889 of the Penal Law, the evidence is insufficient since there is no showing of a falsification of any record by alteration, erasure, obliteration or destruction. (People v. Underhill, 142 N. Y. 38; People v. Anderson, 239 *222 N. Y. 534.) The judgment of the Appellate Division should be modified so as to provide that the judgment of conviction as to the 6th, 13th, 19th and 45th counts of the indictment be reversed and those counts dismissed, otherwise affirmed.

The judgments should be modified in accordance with this opinion and as so modified affirmed.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Scalise, 42 N.E.2d 494, 288 N.Y. 220, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1030 (N.Y. 1942).

42 N.E.2d 494 (People v. Scalise) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cavanagh v. . McGovern
118 N.E. 1064 (New York Court of Appeals, 1917)
People v. . Underhill
36 N.E. 1049 (New York Court of Appeals, 1894)