People v. Scales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Scales

100 A.D.3d 662, 952 N.Y.S.2d 894

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Scales. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 A.D.3d 1500 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 7, 2012·Published

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ambro, J.), rendered November 30, 2010, convicting him of assault in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Dillon, J.E, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ambro, J.), rendered November 30, 2010, convicting him of assault in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Dillon, J.E, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

People v. Scales, 100 A.D.3d 662, 952 N.Y.S.2d 894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

100 A.D.3d 662 (People v. Scales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related