People v. Scalegnio

199 N.E.2d 509, 14 N.Y.2d 744, 250 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1164
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 7, 1964·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order of Appellate Term reversed and motion to suppress granted (see People v. Caliente, 12 N Y 2d 89).

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan. Judge Dye dissents and votes to affirm in the following memorandum: When we take into consideration that, shortly before the officer lawfully stopped defendant’s automobile for a traffic violation, he had observed defendant make contact with a known drug pusher under suspicious circumstances, it was not unreasonable for the officer to believe that defendant was committing the crime of possession of narcotics in his presence. This being so, probable cause existed for the arrest of defendant without a warrant and the officer was justified in seizing what appeared to be a package of marijuana lying in plain sight in the automobile.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Scalegnio, 199 N.E.2d 509, 14 N.Y.2d 744, 250 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1164 (N.Y. 1964).

199 N.E.2d 509 (People v. Scalegnio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Colon
81 Misc. 2d 753 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1975)