People v. Scala
This text of 88 A.D.3d 916 (People v. Scala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Since the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed, he has no basis now to complain that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Johnson, 81 AD3d 663 [2011]; People v Bunn, 79 AD3d 1143, 1143-1144 [2010]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817 [1984]). In any event, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 83 [1982]). Rivera, J.P, Florio, Eng, Hall and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 A.D.3d 916, 931 N.Y.S.2d 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-scala-nyappdiv-2011.