People v. Scala

88 A.D.3d 916, 931 N.Y.S.2d 240

This text of 88 A.D.3d 916 (People v. Scala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Scala, 88 A.D.3d 916, 931 N.Y.S.2d 240 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Since the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed, he has no basis now to complain that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Johnson, 81 AD3d 663 [2011]; People v Bunn, 79 AD3d 1143, 1143-1144 [2010]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817 [1984]). In any event, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 83 [1982]). Rivera, J.P, Florio, Eng, Hall and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bunn
79 A.D.3d 1143 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Johnson
81 A.D.3d 663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 A.D.3d 916, 931 N.Y.S.2d 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-scala-nyappdiv-2011.