People v. Sawdey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sawdey

24 A.D.2d 1073, 265 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2854

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 1073 (People v. Sawdey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sawdey, 24 A.D.2d 1073, 265 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment insofar as it imposes sentence upon defendant unanimously reversed, sentence vacated, and matter remitted to Ontario County Court for proceedings on resentenee in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: The defendant was convicted of violation of subdivision 5 of section 242 of the Penal Law, assault second degree, and was sentenced March 20, 1964, to an indeterminate term of one day to life. While prior to sentence a [1074]*1074psychiatric examination was ordered pursuant to section 2189-a of the Penal Law and the report of the examination submitted to the court before sentence, from a reading of the probation report and the psychiatric report itself it is clear that the court in imposing sentence did not give the findings stated therein, which stated only “ the diagnostic impression of these examiners at this time is Without Mental Disorder; Alcoholism ”, the consideration required by section 2189-a of the Penal Law. (People v. Smith, 22 A D 2d 333.) Upon resentence, with the aid of an additional and current psychiatric report, the court may then pronounce sentence appropriate to the conditions and circumstances here prevailing. (See People v. Mosher, 23 A D 2d 814.) (Appeal from judgment of Ontario County Court convicting defendant of assault, second degree.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Del Veeehio and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment insofar as it imposes sentence upon defendant unanimously reversed, sentence vacated, and matter remitted to Ontario County Court for proceedings on resentenee in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: The defendant was convicted of violation of subdivision 5 of section 242 of the Penal Law, assault second degree, and was sentenced March 20, 1964, to an indeterminate term of one day to life. While prior to sentence a [1074]*1074psychiatric examination was ordered pursuant to section 2189-a of the Penal Law and the report of the examination submitted to the court before sentence, from a reading of the probation report and the psychiatric report itself it is clear that the court in imposing sentence did not give the findings stated therein, which stated only “ the diagnostic impression of these examiners at this time is Without Mental Disorder; Alcoholism ”, the consideration required by section 2189-a of the Penal Law. (People v. Smith, 22 A D 2d 333.) Upon resentence, with the aid of an additional and current psychiatric report, the court may then pronounce sentence appropriate to the conditions and circumstances here prevailing. (See People v. Mosher, 23 A D 2d 814.) (Appeal from judgment of Ontario County Court convicting defendant of assault, second degree.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Del Veeehio and Marsh, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 1073, 265 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sawdey-nyappdiv-1965.