People v. Savio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Savio

117 A.D.2d 633, 498 N.Y.S.2d 84, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52912

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 117 A.D.2d 633 (People v. Savio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Savio, 117 A.D.2d 633, 498 N.Y.S.2d 84, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), rendered January 24, 1984, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

There is nothing in the record to support defendant’s claim that he was denied meaningful representation of counsel (see, People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d [634]*634137, 146). Moreover, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to permit defendant to withdraw his plea where there was no substantive basis to his withdrawal motion and where sufficient inquiry had been made at the time of the plea to determine that defendant entered it knowingly and voluntarily (see, People v Walton, 98 AD2d 842, 843). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), rendered January 24, 1984, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

There is nothing in the record to support defendant’s claim that he was denied meaningful representation of counsel (see, People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d [634]*634137, 146). Moreover, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to permit defendant to withdraw his plea where there was no substantive basis to his withdrawal motion and where sufficient inquiry had been made at the time of the plea to determine that defendant entered it knowingly and voluntarily (see, People v Walton, 98 AD2d 842, 843). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 A.D.2d 633, 498 N.Y.S.2d 84, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-savio-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack