People v. Savinetti

2020 NY Slip Op 04874
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 2, 2020
DocketInd. No. 1469/17
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 04874 (People v. Savinetti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Savinetti, 2020 NY Slip Op 04874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Savinetti (2020 NY Slip Op 04874)
People v Savinetti
2020 NY Slip Op 04874
Decided on September 2, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on September 2, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SHERI S. ROMAN
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

2019-05387
(Ind. No. 1469/17)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Robert Savinetti, appellant.


Leon H. Tracy, Jericho, NY, for appellant.

Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (John B. Latella and Libbi L. Milher of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Terence P. Murphy, J.), rendered April 15, 2019, convicting him of reckless endangerment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant deliberately accelerated his vehicle as his girlfriend was running alongside it banging on the passenger side window and pulling on the door handle in an effort to get into the vehicle, thereby placing her at risk of being dragged or falling underneath the vehicle, which is exactly what happened. Contrary to the defendant's contention, such conduct evinced an awareness of, and conscious disregard of, a substantial and unjustifiable risk of serious physical injury to another person (see Penal Law §§ 120.20, 15.05[3]; People v Asaro, 21 NY3d 677, 684; People v Usman, 181 AD2d 628). Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15[5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633).

BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. Romero
859 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Asaro
998 N.E.2d 810 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Usman
181 A.D.2d 628 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 04874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-savinetti-nyappdiv-2020.