People v. Savarese

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Savarese

220 A.D.2d 784, 633 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10549

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 220 A.D.2d 784 (People v. Savarese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Savarese, 220 A.D.2d 784, 633 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10549 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.), both rendered August 19, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree under Indictment No. 7/92 and perjury in the first degree (two counts) under Indictment No. 434/92, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.), both rendered August 19, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree under Indictment No. 7/92 and perjury in the first degree (two counts) under Indictment No. 434/92, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 A.D.2d 784, 633 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-savarese-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack