People v. Savage

152 A.D.2d 934, 544 N.Y.S.2d 743, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9796
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Savage. Read the opinion of the Court — 148 A.D.2d 553

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the evidence of forcible compulsion was legally insufficient, or, alternatively, that it was against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). We disagree. The jury could reasonably have concluded that the victim submitted to sodomy and sexual abuse on the occasion at issue because defendant threatened her with physical injury (see, Penal Law § 130.00 [8]). We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find that none has merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J. — sodomy, first degree; sexual abuse, first degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Den-man, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Savage, 152 A.D.2d 934, 544 N.Y.S.2d 743, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9796 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

152 A.D.2d 934 (People v. Savage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)