People v. Savage

279 A.D. 1041, 112 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5732
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 30, 1952·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Memorandum: We feel the official records of the clerk of the court at the time of the arraignment suffice to refute petitioner’s claim that he was not advised of his right to counsel. The facts disclosed by this record distinguish the case from Matter of Bojinoff v. People (299 N. Y. 145); People v. Richetti (302 N. Y. 290); People V. Guariglia (303 N. Y. 338); and People v. Langan (303 N. Y. 474). It follows, therefore, that, under the circumstances herein, the petitioner is not entitled to be present at a hearing in open court upon the merits of his application for a writ of error coram nobis. All concur, except McCurn and Piper, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal and for remitting the matter to the Jefferson County Court for a hearing. (See People v. Richetti, 302 N. Y. 290; People v. Guariglia, 303 N. Y. 338 and People v. Langan, 303 N. Y. 474.) (Appeal from an order denying defendant’s application to declare void his judgment of conviction, in a proceeding in the nature of coram nobis.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Savage, 279 A.D. 1041, 112 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5732 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

279 A.D. 1041 (People v. Savage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ali
35 A.D.2d 435 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1971)