People v. Saunders

220 A.D.2d 466, 632 N.Y.S.2d 476

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Saunders. Read the opinion of the Court — 190 A.D.2d 1092 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 31, 1995·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fisher, J.), rendered June 9, 1993, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that he was prejudiced by the prosecutor’s improper comments during summation (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v [467]*467Balls, 69 NY2d 641; People v Nuccie, 57 NY2d 818), and we decline to reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

The defendant’s sentence is neither harsh nor excessive under the circumstances of this case (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Balletta and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s sentence is neither harsh nor excessive under the circumstances of this case (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Balletta and Hart, JJ., concur.

People v. Saunders, 220 A.D.2d 466, 632 N.Y.S.2d 476 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

220 A.D.2d 466 (People v. Saunders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

People v. Nuccie

441 N.E.2d 1111 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)

People v. Balls

503 N.E.2d 1017 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)

People v. Suitte

90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Opinion

Related