People v. Sattan
This text of 129 A.D.3d 747 (People v. Sattan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), imposed February 20, 2013, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
*748 The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 137-138 [2014]; People v Bradshaw, 76 AD3d 566, 569 [2010]), and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 A.D.3d 747, 8 N.Y.S.3d 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sattan-nyappdiv-2015.