People v. Sattan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sattan

129 A.D.3d 747, 8 N.Y.S.3d 915

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 3, 2015·No. 2013-02707·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), imposed February 20, 2013, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

*748 The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 137-138 [2014]; People v Bradshaw, 76 AD3d 566, 569 [2010]), and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Skelos, Leventhal, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), imposed February 20, 2013, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

*748 The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 137-138 [2014]; People v Bradshaw, 76 AD3d 566, 569 [2010]), and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Skelos, Leventhal, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

People v. Sattan, 129 A.D.3d 747, 8 N.Y.S.3d 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

129 A.D.3d 747 (People v. Sattan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related