People v. Satchell

194 A.D.2d 756, 601 N.Y.S.2d 812
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 21, 1993·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.), imposed March 3, 1992, upon his conviction of attempted criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of 2 to 6 years imprisonment.

Ordered that the sentence is modified, on the law, by reducing it to an indeterminate term of lVs to 4 years imprisonment; as so modified, the sentence is affirmed.

As the People concede, the sentence imposed upon the defendant for attempted criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree was illegal because it is greater than the statutory maximum (see, Penal Law § 70.00 [2] [e]). Accordingly, as the defendant and the People request, we reduce the sentence imposed to the maximum legal sentence for attempted criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree. Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Rosenblatt, Eiber and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Satchell, 194 A.D.2d 756, 601 N.Y.S.2d 812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

194 A.D.2d 756 (People v. Satchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Dominguez
210 A.D.2d 249 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Simmons
206 A.D.2d 396 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)