People v. Sartori

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sartori

253 A.D.2d 501, 676 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8883

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 17, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D.2d 501 (People v. Sartori) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sartori, 253 A.D.2d 501, 676 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Angiolillo, J.), rendered April 8, 1996, convicting him of unauthorized practice of a profession (two counts) and criminally possessing a hypodermic instrument, after a non-jury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court correctly determined that the People were ready for trial within the statutorily-prescribed, six-month period (see, CPL 30.30; People v Edwards, 215 AD2d 498).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Angiolillo, J.), rendered April 8, 1996, convicting him of unauthorized practice of a profession (two counts) and criminally possessing a hypodermic instrument, after a non-jury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court correctly determined that the People were ready for trial within the statutorily-prescribed, six-month period (see, CPL 30.30; People v Edwards, 215 AD2d 498).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D.2d 501, 676 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sartori-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack