People v. Sardegna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sardegna

96 A.D.2d 1065, 466 N.Y.S.2d 654, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19716

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 12, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 96 A.D.2d 1065 (People v. Sardegna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sardegna, 96 A.D.2d 1065, 466 N.Y.S.2d 654, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeals (1) by defendant Jeffrey Sardegna from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jaspan, J.), rendered October 15,1981, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of marihuana in the second degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and (2) by defendant Carol Sardegna from a judgment of the same court, also rendered October 15,1981, convicting her of criminal possession of marihuana in the fourth degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeals bring up for review the denial of defendants’ motion to controvert an eavesdropping warrant and to suppress physical evidence. By order of this court [1066]*1066dated December 20, 1982, this matter was remitted to Criminal Term “for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of minimization * * * relating solely to those conversations in which defendants participated” (People v Sardegna, 91 AD2d 671) and the appeals were held in abeyance in the interim. The hearing has been held and Criminal Term has filed its report. Judgments affirmed. No opinion. Titone, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeals (1) by defendant Jeffrey Sardegna from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jaspan, J.), rendered October 15,1981, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of marihuana in the second degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and (2) by defendant Carol Sardegna from a judgment of the same court, also rendered October 15,1981, convicting her of criminal possession of marihuana in the fourth degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeals bring up for review the denial of defendants’ motion to controvert an eavesdropping warrant and to suppress physical evidence. By order of this court [1066]*1066dated December 20, 1982, this matter was remitted to Criminal Term “for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of minimization * * * relating solely to those conversations in which defendants participated” (People v Sardegna, 91 AD2d 671) and the appeals were held in abeyance in the interim. The hearing has been held and Criminal Term has filed its report. Judgments affirmed. No opinion. Titone, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 1065, 466 N.Y.S.2d 654, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sardegna-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack