People v. Saraceni

153 A.D.3d 1561, 60 N.Y.S.3d 870
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Saraceni. Read the opinion of the Court — 153 A.D.3d 1559
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 2017·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), entered March 11, 2015. The order determined that defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant contends that County Court erred in assessing points under risk factors one and four of the risk assessment instrument. Defendant’s contentions are not preserved for our review (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 854 [2014]; People v Wilson, 117 AD3d 1557, 1558 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 902 [2014]; People v Law, 94 AD3d 1561, 1562 [2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 809 [2012]), however, because at the SORA hearing he only contested the points assessed under risk factor 12.

Present — Whalen, P.J., Smith, Centra, Peradotto and Carni, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Saraceni, 153 A.D.3d 1561, 60 N.Y.S.3d 870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

153 A.D.3d 1561 (People v. Saraceni) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
People v. Law
94 A.D.3d 1561 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Wilson
117 A.D.3d 1557 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)