People v. Sapp

286 A.D.2d 787, 729 N.Y.S.2d 916, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8461
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Sapp. Read the opinion of the Court — 280 A.D.2d 906

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Buckley, J.), rendered May 15, 2000, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender in accordance with the plea agreement to a prison term of 3V2 to 7 years. Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that no nonfrivolous appealable issues exist. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633; People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sapp, 286 A.D.2d 787, 729 N.Y.S.2d 916, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8461 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

286 A.D.2d 787 (People v. Sapp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Stokes
744 N.E.2d 1153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Cruwys
113 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)