People v. Sanz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sanz

146 A.D.2d 654, 538 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 408

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 17, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 146 A.D.2d 654 (People v. Sanz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sanz, 146 A.D.2d 654, 538 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 408 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Herold, J.), rendered November 16, 1987.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816).

We have considered the defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed constitutes cruel and unusual punishment and find it to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Eiber, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Herold, J.), rendered November 16, 1987.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816).

We have considered the defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed constitutes cruel and unusual punishment and find it to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Eiber, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 A.D.2d 654, 538 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sanz-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack