People v. Santos

2020 NY Slip Op 3548, 184 A.D.3d 879, 124 N.Y.S.3d 237
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santos. Read the opinion of the Court — 115 N.Y.S.3d 907
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 24, 2020·No. 2016-09558·Published

Opinion

People v Santos (2020 NY Slip Op 03548)
People v Santos
2020 NY Slip Op 03548
Decided on June 24, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 24, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
JEFFREY A. COHEN
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

2016-09558
2016-09559

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Luis Santos, appellant. (S.C.I. Nos. 1753/16, 1754/16)


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Melissa Lee of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and Danielle S. Fenn of counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dorothy Chin-Brandt, J.), both rendered August 11, 2016, convicting him of attempted robbery in the third degree under Superior Court Information No. 1753/16, and bail jumping in the second degree under Superior Court Information No. 1754/16, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, COHEN, CONNOLLY and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santos, 2020 NY Slip Op 3548, 184 A.D.3d 879, 124 N.Y.S.3d 237 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

2020 NY Slip Op 3548 (People v. Santos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)