People v. Santos

21 A.D.3d 911, 800 N.Y.S.2d 512
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santos. Read the opinion of the Court — 3 A.D.3d 317

Opinion

Appeal by the de[912]*912fendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), rendered November 17, 2003, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, based on an acting-in-concert theory. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]). Florio, J.P., H. Miller, Ritter and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santos, 21 A.D.3d 911, 800 N.Y.S.2d 512 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

21 A.D.3d 911 (People v. Santos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)