People v. Santos

176 A.D.2d 245
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 9, 1991·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), imposed November 9, 1989, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of 2 to 4 years imprisonment and a $100 felony surcharge.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s application for a waiver of the $100 mandatory surcharge imposed by the court is premature in view of the defendant’s incarceration (see, People v West, 124 Misc 2d 622; see also, People v Jones, 166 AD2d 724; People v Velez, 150 AD2d 514). If, at the conclusion of his imprisonment, the defendant is unable to pay the mandatory surcharge, he may move at that time for a waiver (see, CPL 420.35; 420.10 [5]; People v Jones, supra; People v Lewis, 134 AD2d 286).

The defendant’s challenge to the imposition of the surcharge as violative of his constitutional rights to equal protection and due process of law is not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Ruz, 70 NY2d 942; People v Cobb, 153 AD2d 642). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santos, 176 A.D.2d 245 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

176 A.D.2d 245 (People v. Santos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Abdus-Samad
274 A.D.2d 666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Johnson
220 A.D.2d 455 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Monroe
216 A.D.2d 494 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Arlequin
214 A.D.2d 747 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)