People v. Santos

807 N.E.2d 881, 1 N.Y.3d 548, 775 N.Y.S.2d 770, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 4060
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 2003·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The Court here lacks power to review the lower courts’ exercise of discretion in vacating the criminal conviction and granting a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence (People v Baxley, 84 NY2d 208, 212 [1994]; People v Fields, 66 NY2d 876, 878 [1985]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo and Read concur.

*549 On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santos, 807 N.E.2d 881, 1 N.Y.3d 548, 775 N.Y.S.2d 770, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 4060 (N.Y. 2003).

807 N.E.2d 881 (People v. Santos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of NYP Holdings, Inc. v. New York City Police Dept.
43 N.Y.3d 357 (New York Court of Appeals, 2025)
People v. Hargrove
2018 NY Slip Op 2649 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Lackey
48 A.D.3d 982 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Burton
9 Misc. 3d 577 (New York Supreme Court, 2005)
Bodie v. Morgenthau
342 F. Supp. 2d 193 (S.D. New York, 2004)