People v. Santos-Mispas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Santos-Mispas

52 A.D.3d 625, 858 N.Y.S.2d 888

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santos-Mispas. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 A.D.3d 923 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 10, 2008·Published

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 27, 2007 (People v Santos-Mispas, 38 AD3d 923 [2007]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered July 30, 2004.

[626]*626Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Fisher, Florio and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 27, 2007 (People v Santos-Mispas, 38 AD3d 923 [2007]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered July 30, 2004.

[626]*626Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Fisher, Florio and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

People v. Santos-Mispas, 52 A.D.3d 625, 858 N.Y.S.2d 888 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

52 A.D.3d 625 (People v. Santos-Mispas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related