People v. Santiago

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santiago. Read the opinion of the Court — 193 N.Y.S.3d 534
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 20, 2026·No. 106 KA 23-01103·Published

Opinion

People v Santiago (2026 NY Slip Op 01659)
People v Santiago
2026 NY Slip Op 01659
Decided on March 20, 2026
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 20, 2026 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: BANNISTER, J.P., MONTOUR, SMITH, NOWAK, AND DELCONTE, JJ.

106 KA 23-01103

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

ANDRES SANTIAGO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)


CHARLES J. GREENBERG, AMHERST, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOHN NABINGER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WATERLOO (KEVIN URBAITIS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Seneca County Court (Barry L. Porsch, J.), rendered May 31, 2023. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Same memorandum as in People v Santiago ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Mar. 20, 2026] [4th Dept 2026]).

Entered: March 20, 2026

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santiago, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

People v. Santiago (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.