People v. Santiago
Opinion
| People v Santiago |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 02256 |
| Decided on April 13, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered: April 13, 2021
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Oing, Kennedy JJ.
Ind No. 2944/16 Appeal No. 13573 Case No. 2019-3948
v
Peter Santiago, Defendant-Appellant.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant.
Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Morgan Namian of counsel), for respondent.
An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (William Mogulescu, J., at plea, Efrain L. Alvarado, J. at sentence), rendered January 17, 2019,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: April 13, 2021
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division,
First Department.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2021 NY Slip Op 02256 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.