People v. Santiago

2017 NY Slip Op 5248, 151 A.D.3d 1073, 54 N.Y.S.3d 598
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santiago. Read the opinion of the Court — 119 A.D.3d 484
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 2017·No. 2015-09399·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Arriaga, J.), imposed July 28, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 137 [2014]; People v Johnson, 109 AD3d 1004 [2013]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Hall, LaSalle, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santiago, 2017 NY Slip Op 5248, 151 A.D.3d 1073, 54 N.Y.S.3d 598 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 5248 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Johnson
109 A.D.3d 1004 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)