People v. Santiago

213 A.D.2d 432, 624 N.Y.S.2d 882
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santiago. Read the opinion of the Court — 181 A.D.2d 460

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), all rendered May 25, 1993, convicting him of burglary in the second degree under Indictment No. 16314/91, attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 3574/92, attempted burglary in the second degree under Indictment No. 10672/92, and burglary in the third degree under Indictment No. 14431/92, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion [433]*433to withdraw his guilty pleas because the motion was based upon unsubstantiated allegations that the defendant was under the influence of drugs at the time of the pleas (see, People v Brown, 208 AD2d 431). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santiago, 213 A.D.2d 432, 624 N.Y.S.2d 882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

213 A.D.2d 432 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brown
208 A.D.2d 431 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)