People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Santiago

41 A.D.2d 916, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4508

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santiago. Read the opinion of the Court — 51 A.D.2d 1 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 10, 1973·Published

Opinion

Motion granted to the extent of amending the remittitur to recite the following: “ Upon the appeal herein there were presented, and necessarily passed upon, questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that his rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution were violated. The Appellate Division held that there was no violation of appellant’s rights.” Concur — Nunez, J. P., Kupferman, Murphy, Lane and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted to the extent of amending the remittitur to recite the following: “ Upon the appeal herein there were presented, and necessarily passed upon, questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that his rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution were violated. The Appellate Division held that there was no violation of appellant’s rights.” Concur — Nunez, J. P., Kupferman, Murphy, Lane and Steuer, JJ.

People v. Santiago, 41 A.D.2d 916, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4508 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

41 A.D.2d 916 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.