People v. Santiago
602 N.E.2d 1118, 80 N.Y.2d 916, 589 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 3222
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, the People’s contention with respect to sentencing was not advanced at a time sufficient to preserve the issue for this Court’s review.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Santiago, 602 N.E.2d 1118, 80 N.Y.2d 916, 589 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 3222 (N.Y. 1992).
602 N.E.2d 1118 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Marquis A.
145 A.D.3d 61 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Reyes
221 A.D.2d 202 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Garcia
642 N.E.2d 1077 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Garcia
195 A.D.2d 253 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Board of Education v. Christa Construction, Inc.
608 N.E.2d 756 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)