People v. Santiago

402 N.E.2d 121, 48 N.Y.2d 1023, 425 N.Y.S.2d 782, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2071
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 15, 1980·Published·Cited by 33 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Since the jury could have found that the defendant’s méthod of operation resulted in this instance in the use of the force of the movement of the train upon the victim to overcome her resistance to the taking of her purse, there was sufficient evidence that his act constituted attempted robbery rather than simple larceny (Penal Law, § 160.00). Furthermore, there was evidence that the victim’s death was caused either "in the course of and in furtherance of’ the attempted robbery or of "immediate flight therefrom” (Penal Law, § 125.25, subd 3). There was, therefore, a sufficient predicate for the felony murder conviction.

[1025]*1025Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santiago, 402 N.E.2d 121, 48 N.Y.2d 1023, 425 N.Y.S.2d 782, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2071 (N.Y. 1980).

402 N.E.2d 121 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kourouma
2021 NY Slip Op 01011 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
United States v. Rabb
942 F.3d 1 (First Circuit, 2019)
United States v. Steed
879 F.3d 440 (First Circuit, 2018)
People v. Chatman
38 A.D.3d 1282 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Dobbs
24 A.D.3d 1043 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
McCargo v. Costello
235 F. Supp. 2d 173 (E.D. New York, 2002)
People v. Baker
297 A.D.2d 748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Dixon
232 A.D.2d 653 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Middleton
212 A.D.2d 809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Nieves
205 A.D.2d 173 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Letterlough
203 A.D.2d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. MacKenzie
193 A.D.2d 700 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re Jamal M.
187 A.D.2d 654 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Hernandez
186 A.D.2d 471 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
McCummings v. New York City Transit Authority
177 A.D.2d 24 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Ross
180 A.D.2d 698 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Wirts
178 A.D.2d 163 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Middleton
152 Misc. 2d 507 (New York Supreme Court, 1991)
State v. Sein
590 A.2d 665 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1991)