People v. Santana

4 A.D.3d 490, 771 N.Y.S.2d 677

This text of 4 A.D.3d 490 (People v. Santana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Santana, 4 A.D.3d 490, 771 N.Y.S.2d 677 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 28, 1996 (People v Santana, 232 AD2d 663 [1996]), affirming three judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County, all rendered March 31, 1994.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]). Prudenti, EJ., Ritter, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Barnes
463 U.S. 745 (Supreme Court, 1983)
People v. Santana
232 A.D.2d 663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 A.D.3d 490, 771 N.Y.S.2d 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-santana-nyappdiv-2004.