People v. Santana

83 A.D.2d 951, 443 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15403
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santana. Read the opinion of the Court — 82 A.D.2d 784

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Radin, J.), rendered August 1,1978, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Ortiz, 80 AD2d 837; People v Pearson, 62 AD2d 1043; People v Foster, 58 AD2d 814; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Gibbons and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santana, 83 A.D.2d 951, 443 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15403 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

83 A.D.2d 951 (People v. Santana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Foster
58 A.D.2d 814 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
People v. Pearson
62 A.D.2d 1043 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
People v. Ortiz
80 A.D.2d 837 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)