People v. Santana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Santana

59 A.D.2d 873, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14050

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 17, 1977·Published

Opinion

Motion granted to the extent of amending the remittitur to recite the following: "Upon the apppeal herein there were presented, and necessarily passed upon, questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that his rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution were violated. The Appellate Division held that there was no violation of appellant’s rights.” Concur—Birns, J. P., Silverman, Markewich and Lynch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted to the extent of amending the remittitur to recite the following: "Upon the apppeal herein there were presented, and necessarily passed upon, questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that his rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution were violated. The Appellate Division held that there was no violation of appellant’s rights.” Concur—Birns, J. P., Silverman, Markewich and Lynch, JJ.

People v. Santana, 59 A.D.2d 873, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14050 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

59 A.D.2d 873 (People v. Santana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.