People v. Santana (Jhony)
This text of People v. Santana (Jhony) (People v. Santana (Jhony)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Jhony Santana, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Larry R.C. Stephen, J.), rendered June 6, 2014, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of sexual abuse in the third degree, and imposing sentence.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Larry R.C. Stephen, J.) rendered, June 6, 2014, affirmed.
The verdict convicting the defendant of sexual abuse in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.55) was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning credibility. The victim's consistent, credible testimony, corroborated by the testimony of a plain-clothes police officer who witnessed the incident, established that defendant pressed his erect penis against the victim's buttocks on a crowded subway car between station stops and repeated this conduct when the victim attempted to move away.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: June 23, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People v. Santana (Jhony), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-santana-jhony-nyappterm-2017.