People v. Sansanese

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sansanese

22 A.D.2d 1008, 254 N.Y.S.2d 560, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2678

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 3, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 1008 (People v. Sansanese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sansanese, 22 A.D.2d 1008, 254 N.Y.S.2d 560, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law, motion denied, and indictments reinstated. Memorandum: An examination of the Grand Jury, minutes shows that defendant used a fictitious name with intent to. deceive and defraud, purporting to be the act of another person, in procuring an operator’s license. This was sufficient to sustain the indictments charging defendant with forgery. (International Union Bank v. National Sur. Co., 245 N. Y. 368.) The minutes also show that he filed a false and forged application for a license, thereby obtaining the signature of the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles on the license, all in violation of provisions of the Penal Law of the State of New York as well as section 392 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law: (See Matter of Sabel v. Hults, 9 N Y 2d 987; People v. Sullivan, 275 App. Div. 956, affd. 300 N. Y. 696, cert. den. 340 U. S. 815; People v. Manzer, 1 A D 2d 750.) (Appeal by People from order of Brie County Court dismissing four indictments charging defendant with obtaining property by false pretense (Penal Law, § 932), offering false or forged instruments to be filed (Penal Law, § 2051), forgery, second degree, and forgery, second degree.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed on the law, motion denied, and indictments reinstated. Memorandum: An examination of the Grand Jury, minutes shows that defendant used a fictitious name with intent to. deceive and defraud, purporting to be the act of another person, in procuring an operator’s license. This was sufficient to sustain the indictments charging defendant with forgery. (International Union Bank v. National Sur. Co., 245 N. Y. 368.) The minutes also show that he filed a false and forged application for a license, thereby obtaining the signature of the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles on the license, all in violation of provisions of the Penal Law of the State of New York as well as section 392 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law: (See Matter of Sabel v. Hults, 9 N Y 2d 987; People v. Sullivan, 275 App. Div. 956, affd. 300 N. Y. 696, cert. den. 340 U. S. 815; People v. Manzer, 1 A D 2d 750.) (Appeal by People from order of Brie County Court dismissing four indictments charging defendant with obtaining property by false pretense (Penal Law, § 932), offering false or forged instruments to be filed (Penal Law, § 2051), forgery, second degree, and forgery, second degree.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 1008, 254 N.Y.S.2d 560, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sansanese-nyappdiv-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack