People v. Sanford

47 A.D.3d 454, 848 N.Y.S.2d 875
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 2008·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), entered on or about March 18, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The hearing court properly determined that although defendant received points relating to the facts of the underlying sex crime, the risk assessment instrument failed to adequately take into account the extreme and unusual brutality of that crime, which warranted an upward departure (see People v Ferrer, 35 AD3d 297 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 807 [2007]; People v Joslyn, 27 AD3d 1033 [2006]). The court considered defendant’s behavior following his release from prison and properly concluded that factor was outweighed by the circumstances of the crime. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Buckley, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sanford, 47 A.D.3d 454, 848 N.Y.S.2d 875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

47 A.D.3d 454 (People v. Sanford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brown
2018 NY Slip Op 4675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
VAILLANCOURT, BRUCE, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
People v. Vaillancourt
112 A.D.3d 1375 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Guasp
95 A.D.3d 608 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Ray
86 A.D.3d 435 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Mangual
59 A.D.3d 279 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)