People v. Sandstrom
This text of 98 A.D.3d 633 (People v. Sandstrom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J.), both rendered February 1, 2011, convicting him of driving while ability impaired by the combined influence of drugs or alcohol and any drug or drugs (two counts, one each under indictment Nos. 2778/09 and 834/10), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by denying his request for a fourth adjournment of sentencing (see People v Singleton, 41 NY2d 402, 405 [1977]; People v Meaney, 154 AD2d 555 [1989]). Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 A.D.3d 633, 949 N.Y.S.2d 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sandstrom-nyappdiv-2012.