People v. Sandoval

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sandoval

55 A.D.2d 661, 389 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15422

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 20, 1976·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the People from an order of the County Court, Rockland County, entered March 22, 1976, which granted the branch of defendant’s motion which sought to dismiss the indictment. Order reversed, on the law, motion denied insofar as it sought to dismiss the indictment, and indictment reinstated. No findings of fact have been presented for review. The prosecutor’s presentation to the Grand Jury of the case against the defendant was fair and proper. There was no activity by the prosecutor which failed to conform to the requirements of CPL article 190 to such a degree that the integrity of the proceedings was impaired. Rabin, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the People from an order of the County Court, Rockland County, entered March 22, 1976, which granted the branch of defendant’s motion which sought to dismiss the indictment. Order reversed, on the law, motion denied insofar as it sought to dismiss the indictment, and indictment reinstated. No findings of fact have been presented for review. The prosecutor’s presentation to the Grand Jury of the case against the defendant was fair and proper. There was no activity by the prosecutor which failed to conform to the requirements of CPL article 190 to such a degree that the integrity of the proceedings was impaired. Rabin, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

People v. Sandoval, 55 A.D.2d 661, 389 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15422 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

55 A.D.2d 661 (People v. Sandoval) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.