People v. Sandoval

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sandoval

55 A.D.2d 661, 389 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15422

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.2d 661 (People v. Sandoval) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sandoval, 55 A.D.2d 661, 389 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15422 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the People from an order of the County Court, Rockland County, entered March 22, 1976, which granted the branch of defendant’s motion which sought to dismiss the indictment. Order reversed, on the law, motion denied insofar as it sought to dismiss the indictment, and indictment reinstated. No findings of fact have been presented for review. The prosecutor’s presentation to the Grand Jury of the case against the defendant was fair and proper. There was no activity by the prosecutor which failed to conform to the requirements of CPL article 190 to such a degree that the integrity of the proceedings was impaired. Rabin, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the People from an order of the County Court, Rockland County, entered March 22, 1976, which granted the branch of defendant’s motion which sought to dismiss the indictment. Order reversed, on the law, motion denied insofar as it sought to dismiss the indictment, and indictment reinstated. No findings of fact have been presented for review. The prosecutor’s presentation to the Grand Jury of the case against the defendant was fair and proper. There was no activity by the prosecutor which failed to conform to the requirements of CPL article 190 to such a degree that the integrity of the proceedings was impaired. Rabin, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 661, 389 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sandoval-nyappdiv-1976.