People v. Sanders

2020 NY Slip Op 930, 180 A.D.3d 1327, 115 N.Y.S.3d 727
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 7, 2020
Docket25 KA 17-02209
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 930 (People v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Sanders, 2020 NY Slip Op 930, 180 A.D.3d 1327, 115 N.Y.S.3d 727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Sanders (2020 NY Slip Op 00930)
People v Sanders
2020 NY Slip Op 00930
Decided on February 7, 2020
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 7, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, CURRAN, WINSLOW, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

25 KA 17-02209

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

WADE SANDERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (SHERRY A. CHASE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DONNA A. MILLING OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Kenneth F. Case, J.), rendered December 13, 2017. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of leaving the scene of an incident resulting in death without reporting.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of leaving the scene of an incident resulting in death without reporting (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600 [2] [a], [c] [ii]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. The record establishes that his oral waiver, coupled with the written waiver of the right to appeal, was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary (see generally People v Thomas, — NY3d &mdash, 2019 NY Slip Op 08545, *4-6 [2019]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Allen, 174 AD3d 1456, 1456-1457 [4th Dept 2019], lv denied 34 NY3d 978 [2019]), and that valid waiver forecloses his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255).

Entered: February 7, 2020

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Brooks
2020 NY Slip Op 06612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Johnson
2020 NY Slip Op 2576 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 930, 180 A.D.3d 1327, 115 N.Y.S.3d 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sanders-nyappdiv-2020.