Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Sanders

People v. Sanders

133 A.D.3d 693, 18 N.Y.S.3d 884
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Sanders. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 A.D.3d 748 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 12, 2015·No. 2012-01791·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walsh, J.), imposed January 3, 2012, upon her plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of her right to appeal precludes review of her contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337 [2015]; People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735 [1998]; People v Carter, 114 AD3d 960 [2014]; People v Azeez, 95 AD3d 1349 [2012]). Eng, P.J., Mastro, Sgroi, Miller and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sanders, 133 A.D.3d 693, 18 N.Y.S.3d 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

133 A.D.3d 693 (People v. Sanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Azeez
95 A.D.3d 1349 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Carter
114 A.D.3d 960 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)