People v. Sanders

63 A.D.3d 519, 880 N.Y.S.2d 472
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Sanders. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 A.D.3d 944

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered February 13, 2008, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender, to a term of SVz years, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s main and supplemental charges on the agency defense sufficiently conveyed the appropriate principles. The court properly instructed the jury to consider all the relevant factors, and any emphasis on the principle that a person who arranges a drug transaction primarily for his or her own benefit is not an agent (see People v Lam Lek Chong, 45 NY2d 64, 74-75 [1978], cert denied 439 US 935 [1978]; People v Brown, 52 AD3d 204 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 786 [2008]; People v Sanchez, 35 AD3d 161 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 949 [2007]) was prompted by defendant’s own testimony revealing that he made the equivalent of a 50% commission on the transaction, as well as by the jury’s request for reinstruction on this factor.

The surcharges and fees were properly imposed (see People v Guerrero, 12 NY3d 45 [2009]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sanders, 63 A.D.3d 519, 880 N.Y.S.2d 472 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

63 A.D.3d 519 (People v. Sanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Guerrero
904 N.E.2d 823 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Lam Lek Chong
379 N.E.2d 200 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Sanchez
35 A.D.3d 161 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Brown
52 A.D.3d 204 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)