People v. Sanders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Sanders

246 A.D.2d 495, 667 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 720

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 246 A.D.2d 495 (People v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Sanders, 246 A.D.2d 495, 667 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 720 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Donati, J.), rendered April 12, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2V2 to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea, after sufficient inquiry, notwithstanding defendant’s conclusory claims of innocence and coercion, since the plea was knowing, voluntary and intelligent, and since defendant declined the opportunity to elaborate on his claims or to pursue the matter any further (see, People v Vasquez, 242 AD2d 452).

Defendant’s guilty plea forecloses appellate review of the court’s Sandoval ruling (People v Atkins, 239 AD2d 108, lv denied 90 NY2d 901). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Donati, J.), rendered April 12, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2V2 to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea, after sufficient inquiry, notwithstanding defendant’s conclusory claims of innocence and coercion, since the plea was knowing, voluntary and intelligent, and since defendant declined the opportunity to elaborate on his claims or to pursue the matter any further (see, People v Vasquez, 242 AD2d 452).

Defendant’s guilty plea forecloses appellate review of the court’s Sandoval ruling (People v Atkins, 239 AD2d 108, lv denied 90 NY2d 901). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D.2d 495, 667 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sanders-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack