People v. Sanders

240 A.D.2d 440, 659 N.Y.S.2d 978, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5763
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Sanders. Read the opinion of the Court — 227 A.D.2d 506

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered December 5, 1995, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), upon a finding that he had violated conditions thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of falsifying business records in the first degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The court’s finding that the appellant violated the terms of his probation was supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see, People v Yutesler, 177 AD2d 732; People v Minard, 161 AD2d 607; People v Machia, 96 AD2d 1113, 1114; CPL 410.70 [3]). Moreover, contrary to the appellant’s contention, the sentence imposed was neither illegal nor excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Sanders, 240 A.D.2d 440, 659 N.Y.S.2d 978, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5763 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

240 A.D.2d 440 (People v. Sanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Machia
96 A.D.2d 1113 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Minard
161 A.D.2d 607 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Yutesler
177 A.D.2d 732 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)